When someone else reviews your work, you need a clean way to see what they changed and what they only suggested. Track Changes records every edit. Comments leave feedback without touching the text. Today you will put both on a reviewed copy of your Something Real newsletter, the same way a Work Experience supervisor or club secretary would mark up a draft.
You will need your project newsletter {{code:sm1_doc2_newsletter.docx}} in {{code:Project_Portfolio/09_specialism/sm1}}. Your reviewed file will be saved as {{code:sm1_doc2_newsletter_reviewed.docx}} in the same folder.
Think of the last time someone corrected your writing. Did they rewrite over your words, or leave notes beside them? Which felt clearer, and why?
Review tools keep the original draft visible while feedback is added. Your teacher will point to each idea on the live demo; use the table as a quick reference.
| Concept | Why it matters | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Track Changes / Suggesting | Records every insert and delete in colour so the owner can accept or reject later, and you keep a full history instead of guessing who rewrote a paragraph | A Work Experience supervisor rewrites one line of your placement summary; their name and a different colour sit beside the markup |
| Comments | Sticky notes on selected text that suggest or question without rewriting the wording, so feedback stays separate and the writer chooses what to act on | A club secretary highlights your GAA fundraiser date and comments to confirm it with the committee before print |
| Reply to a comment | A threaded response under someone else's note keeps the conversation in the document instead of a long email chain | You reply that the date is confirmed with the chair, under the comment above |
| Reviewed copy | A separate file saved for review, leaving the clean working draft untouched so you can always go back. In OneDrive use {{btn:Copy to}}; in Google Drive use {{btn:Make a copy}}; then rename the copy before any markup | Your clean newsletter stays as {{code:sm1_doc2_newsletter.docx}}; the marked-up version is {{code:sm1_doc2_newsletter_reviewed.docx}} |
On a one-page catering newsletter, review mode might show:
Your teacher will show a live sample with a second name on the markup, then you practise the same pattern on a short practice file before reviewing your own newsletter.
Create a new short practice file in your {{code:sm1}} folder, paste or type the sample paragraph from the steps, turn on review tools, make two tracked edits, leave one comment with a reply, and check the author label on the markup. Your teacher will demo the first pass on the classroom screen (including a second reviewer name on the board sample), then you complete the same sequence on your device.
Almost everyone forgets to switch review on the first time. Check the table before you panic.
| Issue | Solution |
|---|---|
| My edits do not show as markup; the text just changes | Track Changes is off (Word) or you are still in Editing mode (Google Docs). Turn Track Changes on, or switch the pencil menu to Suggesting, then make a fresh edit to test. |
| I cannot find the Review tab or New Comment | In Word Online, widen the browser window so the ribbon does not collapse. In Google Docs, use the comment icon in the toolbar (or the optional shortcut your teacher showed for your suite). |
| My comment sits on the wrong sentence | Select the exact words first, then add the comment. Delete the misplaced comment and re-pin it to the right phrase. |
| I overwrote my clean newsletter by mistake | Use version history (OneDrive or Drive) to restore the earlier clean copy, then make a separate reviewed file with {{btn:Copy to}} or {{btn:Make a copy}} and a new name before you turn review tools on again. |
Do not edit your clean newsletter. Work only on a separate reviewed copy. This file is Specialism portfolio evidence for your Student Task document strand (professional review with Track Changes or Suggesting plus comments).
1. Copy and rename first
Open {{code:Project_Portfolio}}, then open {{code:09_specialism}} and {{code:sm1}}. Make a separate copy of {{code:sm1_doc2_newsletter.docx}} and name that copy {{code:sm1_doc2_newsletter_reviewed.docx}}. Keep both files in {{code:sm1}}.
If you do not have {{code:sm1_doc2_newsletter.docx}}, tell your teacher. Use the class copy, save it into {{code:09_specialism/sm1}} first, then make your reviewed copy from that. Wait until your teacher has checked the new filename before you edit anything.
2. Turn review tools on
3. Make three real edits and one comment
On the reviewed copy only, make at least three edits that improve clarity for your project audience. Add at least one comment that asks a useful question or flags a decision still to confirm. Hover over or open one change and check the author label. Leave review tools on when you finish so the markup stays visible.
Ideas if you are stuck: change a vague date to an exact date; add a school email where a contact is missing; split a long sentence into two shorter ones; fix a price or time the audience might misread. Do not invent random typos just to hit three.
You're previewing this lesson. Get full access to this lesson and hundreds more — each one ready to teach, with interactive activities, printable resources and pupil progress tracking built in.