Some rights questions are easy because one side is clearly wrong. Today is about the harder kind: two rights that both look real, pulling against each other at the same time. You will weigh school cases, commit to a call, see how the class splits, and practise naming both sides fairly. Disagreement is allowed. Thoughtful people often land in different places.

A conflict of rights is when two legitimate claims cannot both be fully met at once. An abuse of rights is different: somebody's claim is simply denied or ignored. The skill is to name both rights, say what each person stands to lose, and explain a view without flattening the other side. You will learn that skill on real school cases next, not in the abstract.

Work in pairs on the first two cases only. For each case, follow the three beats on the board: name the two rights (2 minutes), say what each person stands to lose (2 minutes), then commit to a verdict (1 minute).

Now vote on the cases on your own device. Everyone commits silently first, before anyone argues. We will put the splits on the board and hear the strongest voice on the case that divides the room most.

Talk in pairs, then share one line with the class if you want to.

Which case did you change your mind on, and what changed it?

If nothing moved you, name the strongest reason you heard on the side you still reject.