You already practise judging whether a post informs a decision or mainly stirs feeling. Today the question is bigger: does digital media strengthen democracy, or threaten it?
You will hear the strongest case on both sides, place yourself on a line, and you may move. There is no single right answer the lesson is steering you toward. Your job is to weigh both sides fairly and state your own view.
A democracy needs people who can find out what is going on, share views, and hold power to account. Digital technologies have changed how all three of those happen.
On the motion Digital media strengthens democracy more than it threatens it, take a quiet ten seconds. Where do you stand right now: agree, disagree, or not sure? You do not need reasons yet. Just notice your starting place.
Use the interactive activity to place the class on the line. Steelmanning means giving the other side its strongest honest version, not a weak version that is easy to knock down.
The motion: Digital media strengthens democracy more than it threatens it.
Case for: digital media strengthens democracy
- Access and voice. News and different viewpoints are easier to find than when people relied on a few newspapers or TV channels, and people who never had a column or a slot can still publish to a wide audience.
- Scrutiny and organising. Phone footage and citizen reporting can catch what officials or companies would rather keep quiet, and groups can coordinate petitions, meetings and local action cheaply and quickly.
Optional: more on the strengthen case
- Someone in a small town can read the same sources as someone in a capital city.
- Young people, local campaigners and minority groups can put an issue in front of a wide audience without waiting for a traditional gatekeeper.
- Public figures face questions faster, and evidence can spread before it is buried.
- Cheaper organising makes it easier for ordinary people to take part in civic life.
Case against: digital media threatens democracy
- Disinformation and manipulation. False claims travel fast, often faster than corrections, and targeted ads, doctored clips or emotionally engineered posts can push people toward a view without them noticing the techniques.
- Division and silencing. Personalised feeds can show each person a different version of the world, and harassment or fear of being clipped out of context can push people out of public debate rather than into it.
Optional: more on the threaten case
- When people vote or protest on the basis of something that is not true, public decisions get worse.
- Some persuasion is designed to bypass careful thought.
- Shared facts get harder to find, and opponents look more extreme than they are.
- Elected representatives and ordinary posters can be driven offline by pile-ons and pressure.
Pair task (about 90 seconds): with a partner, underline or name the single strongest point on each side. Be ready to feed one point into the class line.
After the pair task: place yourself again on the line. You may stay put. Moving is not weakness; it is evidence you heard something that mattered.
The markers stand for groups in the room, not individual people. Your teacher drags one onto the line for each cluster of you standing together, so the board mirrors where the class actually is. Use as many as you need.
Interactive activity
In pairs, work through these three moves.
- Say where you stand. One plain sentence on the main motion: strengthens more, threatens more, or genuinely balanced.
- Put the other side fairly. Give the strongest point from the side you do not fully agree with, said so well that someone on that side would recognise it.
- Name what would change your mind. Finish this sentence: I would move towards … if …
I would move towards strengthen if major apps had to show who paid for political ads.
I would move towards threaten if deepfake election clips became common in Ireland.
Both partners have spoken, each has put the other side fairly once, and each has named what would change their mind rather than only repeating where they started.
Look back at the markers on the line. Did the room move?
Tell your partner three things:
- One benefit digital media can bring to democracy.
- One risk it can create.
- Whether your own position moved, and what influenced it.
These are not two separate internets. They are trade-offs inside the same platforms and habits. You do not have to agree with everyone: strong thinking means understanding both sides, checking the evidence, and being able to explain where you stand and what would change it.
Unlock the full learning experience
You're previewing this lesson. Get full access to this lesson and hundreds more — each one ready to teach, with interactive activities, printable resources and pupil progress tracking built in.
This lesson is copyright of Coding Ireland 2017 - 2025. Unauthorised use, copying or distribution is not allowed.