1 - Start ~4 mins
You already have ways to spot whether an image, clip or audio has been altered, and whether an edit looks fair or designed to mislead. Today the question shifts: once something has been changed, what is that change doing to the person who sees or hears it? You will compare matched before-and-after pairs, name the exact edit, and say which reaction it is engineered to produce.
2 - Examine and Discuss ~4 mins
Manipulation is not only about truth or lies. It is also about feeling. Keep this three-part frame on every pair today:
- Change: exactly what was different from the original
- Technique: crop, colour grade (making the picture darker, brighter, or more dramatic with colour and contrast), cut, caption, soundtrack, and so on
- Engineered reaction: anger, sympathy, fear, trust, excitement, urgency
Fair edit: makes something clearer without changing what happened.
Misleading edit: engineers a reaction the original would not have earned on its own.
You will meet the ideas on the first pair, not in a long talk. At least one piece today is a harmless, legitimate edit.
3 - Hands-on: Before-and-after Teardown ~10 mins
Work through the interactive activity as a class. Each item shows the altered post. The original is described in the instructions at the top - there is no second picture to look at. Read it first, then tap the zones to find what was changed.
For every zone you open, say out loud:
- what exactly was changed from the original
- which technique was used
- which audience reaction it is engineered to produce
One of the pieces is a fair, legitimate edit. On that piece you are checking whether each zone is a persuasion trick or ordinary production work. Be ready to defend that call.
What changed (keep these visible while you work):
- StormWatch local weather post. Original: ordinary grey sky over a pitch; plain caption Light rain possible near the east pitch this afternoon. Altered (on screen): heavily darkened, contrast cranked up, panic wording and urgency prompts.
- Club Day sports photo. Original: slightly dull, underexposed match photo of the real moment. Altered (on screen): brightness and colour balanced for a match report; same people and action; small print says nobody was added or removed.
Interactive activity
4 - Your Turn ~16 mins
On your own or in a pair, work through two short cases. Each case shows a tiny original vs shared contrast so you are judging something concrete.
For each case, fill three rows:
- Change: what was done to the original
- Intended effect: what the audience is pushed to feel or believe
- Fair or misleading: your call, plus one reason
Sentence starters if you need them: The change was… / It pushes the audience to feel… / I call this fair/misleading because…
Case 1. Pitchside crowd post (image).
Original: wide shot of a half-empty stand; calm caption about the home fixture.
Shared version: tight crop so only the full section remains; headline PACKED house. The whole town turned up. plus a hurry-up ticket line.
Fill your three rows for Case 1 now.
Case 2. School news interview (video + sound). Your teacher will play (or read) both versions once each.
Original: slightly dark phone video; the coach's voice is quiet; the full answer about the result and the next fixture is kept; room sound only; no music.
Shared version: brightness lifted and voice levels raised so it is easy to see and hear; the same full answer, nothing cut; on-screen note Levels and brightness adjusted for the school site. No words cut.
Listen first, then write. Do not start the rows until both versions have been played.
After you hear both, name the sound or picture change in one phrase before you fill Intended effect.
Fill your three rows for Case 2 now.
Before you finish, check:
- two cases complete (core bar): each has Change, Intended effect, and Fair or misleading + one reason
- at least one case called fair and at least one called misleading, with reasons that tie to what the audience is pushed to feel or believe
- you can say your reason out loud in one sentence if asked
Save it the class way.
5 - Make Sense ~3 mins
Pull the class together. What patterns did you find?
- The same scene can be steered toward fear, excitement, sympathy or trust by a small set of techniques: crop, colour grade, cut, caption, soundtrack.
- A fair edit makes something clearer without changing what happened. A misleading edit engineers a reaction the original would not have earned on its own.
- Captions and sound often do as much work as the picture. The visual change and the words or music around it work as a pair.
The critical point: spotting that something was changed is only half the skill. Naming what the change is doing to you is what protects your judgement when you decide what to believe or share.
Unlock the full learning experience
You're previewing this lesson. Get full access to this lesson and hundreds more — each one ready to teach, with interactive activities, printable resources and pupil progress tracking built in.
This lesson is copyright of Coding Ireland 2017 - 2025. Unauthorised use, copying or distribution is not allowed.