You already have a showable piece, a research log, and a reference list from earlier project work. Today you package those parts so the whole Student Project is ready to hand in: the piece itself, the log, the references, and any consent notes, named clearly and in the structure your class agreed. By the end, a partner who has never seen your folder should be able to open it and find everything without asking you.

Confirm the structure on the board, then start your folder. A clear package usually includes:

• The piece: your published digital work in the format you chose
• The research log: the record of planning, sources and decisions
• The references: every source credited in the agreed format
• Consent notes: only if your piece needed someone else's permission (a photo of a person, a quote they gave you, a group clip)

Build your submission package from what you already have. Work in the place your class saves project work.

1. Create or open your project folder using the structure on the board.
2. If a file is still on your phone or in a chat, get it into the class save location first before you rename anything. If transfer is slow, get the piece and the log in first, rename those, and leave references or consent for after the partner check or a gap-list note. If the file will not move off your phone in class, put a gap-list note naming the file and where it lives, then package everything that is already on the school device. Do not spend the period stuck on transfer.
3. Add your finished piece in the format you will submit (the actual file a viewer would open).
4. Add your research log and your full reference list.
5. Add any consent notes if your piece needed them. If you needed none, do not invent a file; leave that slot empty or mark not needed only if your teacher asked for that note.
6. Rename every file so someone else can tell what it is without opening it.
7. Open each file once on this device. If something fails, fix the format or replace the file now.
8. Save the whole package the class way so it is still there next session.

One partner opens for about two minutes. Use this list only as a silent scan (do not read it out as a quiz):

• Can I find the piece quickly?
• Can I find the research log and the references?
• Does every file I click actually open?
• Are the names clear enough that I know what each file is for?
• If consent was needed, is the note there? If not needed, is that obvious?

Pull together what the cold-open showed. A strong package is not only complete; it is navigable. If a partner could not find the log, open a clip, or tell which file was final, the work was still unfinished even if the piece itself was good.